Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2001 DAILYLAW 1464 (PNJ)

(O&M)SUDESH KUMARI v. SUNITA AND ANR

RSA/4426/2001 · 2026-04-01

Amarinder Singh Grewal

body2001

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA No. 4426 of 2001 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (Sr. No. 233) (1) RSA No. 4426 of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 01.04.2026 Sudesh Kumari ...Appellant Versus Sunita and another ...Respondents (2) RSA No. 1940 of 2006 (O&M) Sudesh Kumari ...Appellant Versus Parikshit Rana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: None for the appellant in both cases. Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate for respondent No. 1 in RSA-4426-2001. Ms. Falheen, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No. 1 in RSA-1940-2006. Respondent No. 2 has been proceeded against ex-parte v.o.d. 04.09.2002 in RSA-4426-2001. *** Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral) No one had appeared on behalf of the appellant on the last date of hearing. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that appellant is not interested in pursuing the present remedy. RSA No. 4426 of 2001 (O&M) 2 2. The present appeals stand dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the appellant to seek their revival within the period of limitation, in case, any cogent cause of action survives. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. April 01, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No