IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 235 RSA-3578-2001(O&M) Date of Decision:-22.01.2026 Krishan Kumar
   …Appellant Versus Hari Singh and others ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Advocate, & Mr. J. S. Sohal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL , J. (Oral)  A perusal of the case file shows that on the previous date no one had appeared on behalf of the appellant and the Registry was directed to intimate learned counsel for the appellant about the next date of hearing. Today, despite due intimation to learned counsel for the appellant, there is no representation on his behalf. 2. In view of the above, and considering the fact that the present appeal pertains to the year 2001, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the legal representatives of the appellant to seek revival of the same, if so advised, as per law. 3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 22.01.2026 anil Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No ANIL KUMAR 2026.01.23 13:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document