RAMDEO PARMAL THAKUR and ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ANR
APEAL/594/2001 · 2026-08-27
Criminal Appealbody2001
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2001 DAILYLAW 1080 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2001 DAILYLAW 1080 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
16-APEAL-594-2001.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 594 OF 2001
1. Ramdeo Parmal Thakur
2. Sudarshan Prasad Shankar Thakur …Appellants V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents None for the Appellants. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM :
N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE :
27.08.2026.
P.C. :
1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 06.06.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 64 of 1990 by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 304 part II and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years.
2. The report submitted by the concerned police station pursuant to bailable warrant issued against the appellants shows that both the appellants expired during the pendency of the present appeal.
3. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.] Pramod S.Lakare 1/1