( 1 ) WITH the consent of the parties writ petitions are taken up for disposal. By this composite Order I would be disposing of writ petitioners beering CW Nos. 4424/2000, 924/2001 and 6591/2000, as common questions of fact and law are involved. ( 2 ) PETITIONERS in these cases were the applicants for allotment of MIG flats under the New Pattern Registration Scheme 1979 of the DDA. The undisputed facts are that the petitioners had duly paid the initial deposit as required under the scheme and were issued registration certificates. Thereafter the petitioners were also issued demand-cum-allotment letters intimating that MIG flats at the specified colony had been allotted. The petitioners benafide believed that with the receipt of the allotment letter their quest for shelter and housing was over. Petitioners later on discovered to their chargin that it was a case of double and wrong allotment in CM nos. 4424/2000 and 6591/2000. While in CW No. 924/2001, it was a case of wrong allotment, wrong allotment here refers to the flat being allotted in LIG Category, while the application was for a MIG flat. Double allotment of course signifies the said flat having been allotted to some one else also. ( 3 ) COUNSEL for the petitioner has urged before me that the petitioners had duly complied with their obligations under the scheme and they could not be faulted with if the DDA either made a wrong allotment or on account of malpractices it turned out to be a case of double allotment. In fact DDA itself has evolved a policy for dealing with cases of double allotment and wrong allotment. The earlier resolution No. 103/93 and resolution No. 144/93 dated. 16. 11. 1993 embody the policy of dealing with cases of double allotment. It is not necessary to dwell on the policy embodied in these resolutions. It is sufficient to notice that as per the policy, the DDA is to allot the flats at the old/original cost. In fact it is also required to pay interest on the registration amount. ( 4 ) IT may also be noticed that Resolution No. 144/93 was passed pursuant to the decision of this court In Suraj Bhan Chaudhary Vs. PDA CM No. 3827/92. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the respondents very fairly states that he has Instructions to state that the respondents would also allot flats at the old cost. ( 4 ) IT may also be noticed that Resolution No. 144/93 was passed pursuant to the decision of this court In Suraj Bhan Chaudhary Vs. PDA CM No. 3827/92. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the respondents very fairly states that he has Instructions to state that the respondents would also allot flats at the old cost. As regards Interest on the deposited amount, rather petitioners had approached the court belatedly. Learned counsel for the petitioner, In these circumstances does not press the claim for Interest on the registration amount. Respondent shall take steps to allot the flats In Peeragarhi as proposed. The requisite formalities Including the Issuance of demand-cum-allotment letter for the flats to be allotted. If not done already, shall be completed and possession be handed over to the petitioners within a period of 2 months from today. writ petitions stand disposed of.