APHC010176382001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO Between: 1. P.Venugopala Reddy,, S/o. Late Eswara Reddy, Contractor, R/o. Flat No. 4, 'X Block, Lotus Colony, Nandanam, 1. Sri M S Ramanathan, S/o. Late M.Subba Rao, Chief Engineer (Retd,) and Sole Arbitrator, No. 163, 11th Karnataka State. 2. Union of India rep by its Construction Engineer, Civil Engineering Division, Department of Space, Shar Centre, Sriharikota Appeal Under Section_____against ordersset aside the decree and judgment of the Court below passed on 14.2.2000 in Os.No. 203/1993, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, in so far as disallowing Claim No. 5 is concerned IA NO: 1 OF 2001(CMP 188 OF 200 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 1145 & 1165 OF 2001 1. P.Venugopala Reddy,, S/o. Late Eswara Reddy, Contractor, R/o. Flat No. 4, 'X Block, Lotus Colony, Nandanam, ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri M S Ramanathan, S/o. Late M.Subba Rao, Chief Engineer (Retd,) and Sole Arbitrator, No. 163, 11th Main, Saraswathipuram, Mysore 2. Union of India rep by its Construction Engineer, Civil Engineering Division, Department of Space, Shar Centre, Sriharikota - 524 124, Nellore District. ...Respondents Section_____against ordersset aside the decree and judgment of the Court below passed on 14.2.2000 in Os.No. 203/1993, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, in so far as disallowing Claim IA NO: 1 OF 2001(CMP 188 OF 2001 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA OF 2001 1. P.Venugopala Reddy,, S/o. Late Eswara Reddy, Contractor, R/o. Flat No. 4, ...Petitioner 1. Sri M S Ramanathan, S/o. Late M.Subba Rao, Chief Engineer (Retd,) and Main, Saraswathipuram, Mysore - 570 009, 2. Union of India rep by its Construction Engineer, Civil Engineering Division, 524 124, Nellore District. ...Respondents Section_____against ordersset aside the decree and judgment of the Court below passed on 14.2.2000 in Os.No. 203/1993, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, in so far as disallowing Claim Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 8 days in presenting CMA.No. /2000 against the decree and judgment passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur dated 14.2.2000 in O.S.No. 203/1993 IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 483 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased set aside the default order dated 23.10.2009 made in CMA No.1145/2001 restore the appeal, hear the same on merits IA NO: 2 OF 2010(CMAMP 8998 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: G ADI SESHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: A RADHA KRISHNA The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 1145 & 1165 OF 2001 COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 05.08.2026, there was no representation on either side. Accordingly, the matter was posted to 19.08.2026 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. 2. On 19.08.2026 also, there was no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity, it was posted to today under the same caption. 3. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that appellant is not interested to prosecute the case. 4. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed. ____________________ BATTU DEVANAND, J _______________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Dated:02.9.2026 TJN/SZT 34 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 1145 & 1165 OF 2001 Dated: 02.9.2026 TJN/SZT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 1145 & 1165 OF 2001 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02.9.2026 DEV, J & GTK, J The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vide Separate Common Judgment) _______ DEV, J _______ GTK, J TJN/SZT