501-wp-4886-2000-wp.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4886 OF 2000 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4894 OF 2000 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16061 OF 2024 Shri Bholadasji Mandir Etc … Petitioner vs. Vishwanath Shankar Vadnekar and Ors … Respondents Mr. Hrishikesh S. Shinde for the Petitioner Mr. Kishor Shrivaishnav, Petitioner present. Mr. Sham Thakur for Respondent. Mr. Prakash V. Vadnerkar and Mr. Shashikant V. Vadnerkar for Respondent Nos. 1B and 1C(on VC). Mr. Naresh Prakash Vadnerkar, Respondent No. 1B and 1C present. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 18th AUGUST 2026 ORDER: 1. Not on board. Taken on the production board in view of the production praecipe submitted on behalf of the respondent. 2. Learned counsels for the parties tendered two separate Page no. 1 of 3 varsha VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Digitally signed by VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Date: 2026.08.19 11:15:21 +0530 501-wp-4886-2000-wp.doc consent terms dated 1st August 2026, in each of the petitions. The consent terms are signed by the authorised representative who is the Trustee of the petitioner and the respondents. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the respondents have joined through Video Conferencing. The consent terms is also signed by the Power of Attorney holder of the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents identifies the respondents who have joined through the Video Conferencing and the Power of Attorney holder who is present in the court. 3. The photocopy of the terms agreed between the parties recorded in a Memorandum of Understanding, in Marathi is annexed to both the consent terms. The letter issued by the Nashik Municipal Corporation recording rehabilitation of the respondents is also annexed to the consent terms. The consent terms are also signed by the respective advocates. Learned counsel for the petitioner identifies the authorised representative and the sole trustee of the petitioner who has signed the consent terms and is present in the court. 4. The consent terms dated 1st August 2026 are taken on record in each of the petitions and marked ‘X’ and ‘X-1’ respectively with today’s date for identification. Page no. 2 of 3 501-wp-4886-2000-wp.doc 5. The assurances recorded in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings to this court. The terms agreed as recorded in the copy of the Memorandum of Undertaking in Marathi which is annexed to the consent terms shall also be treated as a part of the consent terms. 6. The writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 7. Interim Applications pending, if any, are disposed of as infructuous. (GAURI GODSE, J.) Page no. 3 of 3