RSA No.883 of 2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 124 PRINCIPAL, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, ROHTAK AND ANR. Vs RAJPAL SINGH AND ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for Mr. Gurneet Singh Budhiraja, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the decree dated 28.09.1999 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Rohtak, whereby the judgment and decree dated 14.01.1999 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Rohtak, w the appellants/defendants was dismissed. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant of letter dated 02.08.2024 issued by the Superintendent (Estt. T) for Registrar, Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak infructuous. In such circumstances become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. September 03, 202 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2000 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.883 Date of Decision: PRINCIPAL, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, ROHTAK AND ANR. RAJPAL SINGH AND ANR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for Mr. Gurneet Singh Budhiraja, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the decree dated 28.09.1999 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Rohtak, whereby the judgment and decree dated 14.01.1999 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Rohtak, was upheld and the appeal filed at the instance of the appellants/defendants was dismissed. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant of letter dated 02.08.2024 issued by the Superintendent (Estt. T) for Registrar, ayanand University, Rohtak, the present appeal is In such circumstances, the present appeal is become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 883 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 PRINCIPAL, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, ROHTAK AND ANR. ......Appellants ....Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for Mr. Gurneet Singh Budhiraja, Advocate Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgment and decree dated 28.09.1999 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Rohtak, whereby the judgment and decree dated 14.01.1999 passed by the learned Civil as upheld and the appeal filed at the instance of At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits in view of letter dated 02.08.2024 issued by the Superintendent (Estt. T) for Registrar, , the present appeal is rendered , the present appeal is disposed of having Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 judgment and decree dated 28.09.1999 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Rohtak, whereby the judgment and decree dated 14.01.1999 passed by the learned Civil as upheld and the appeal filed at the instance of in view of letter dated 02.08.2024 issued by the Superintendent (Estt. T) for Registrar, rendered having MOHMED ATIK 2026.09.03 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document