IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 204 CWP-12500-2000 Date of Decision: 24.07.2026 VIRENDER SINGH ... Petitioner VERSUS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: None. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. A letter has been circulated by the Bar Association, the lawyers are abstaining from work. 2. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner and reliance in this regard is placed on CWP-14379-1998 in the index, which was allowed by the Division Bench on 05.08.1999, against which no SLP was filed, as also CWP- 16627 of 1999, which was disposed of on 07.08.2000 directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner and in case, not found entitled for regularization, reasoned order be communicated. 3. In view of the above, without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner in six months in accordance with law taking note of the aforesaid judgment and the case of ‘Madan Singh and Others RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.24 16:42 I am the author of this document CWP-12500-2000 -2- Versus State of Haryana and others’ Civil Appeal No.1996 of 2024, dated 16.04.2026 passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court and ‘State of Haryana and Another Versus Saroj Rani @ Saroj Devi’, LPA-1092-2026, decided on 15.05.2026 after granting an opportunity of hearing to him, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 24, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.24 16:42 I am the author of this document