Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2000 DAILYLAW 1712 (PNJ)

AMAR KAUR v. JAGDISH LAL AND OTHERS

RSA/635/2000 · 2026-07-13

Parmod Goyal

body2000

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114+237(1) RSA-635-2000 WITH Date of decision:13.07.2026 AMAR KAUR ...APPELLANT VERSUS JAGDISH LAL AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS 114+237(2) RSA-1699-2005 (O&M), Date of decision:13.07.2026 AMAR KAUR ...APPELLANT VERSUS DES RAJ ...RESPONDENT 114+237(3) RSA-2649-2009 (O&M), Date of decision:13.07.2026 AMAR KAUR ...APPELLANT VERSUS SANTOSH KUMAR ...RESPONDENT 114+237(4) RSA-2672-2004 (O&M), Date of decision:13.07.2026 AMAR KAUR ...APPELLANT VERSUS SUCHA SINGH AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None for appellant(s). Ms. Aeshna Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2 in RSA No.635 of 2000. Mr. Saachi Mahajan, Advocate and Mr. Shiv Charanjit, Advocate for Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Senior Advocate for respondent in RSA No.2672 of 2004. *** SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.14 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-635-2000 WITH RSA-1699-2005 (O&M) -2- RSA-2649-2009 (O&M) RSA-2672-2004 (O&M) PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) On 01.04.2026 as well as 13.01.2026, none had appeared on behalf of appellant(s) in present appeals. Today again, no representation has been made on behalf of appellant(s). 2. In these circumstances, present appeals are dismissed for non- prosecution with liberty to appellant(s) to seek revival by showing just cause. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 4. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of connected cases. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Sunil Chander Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.14 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document