Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CWP-17895-2000 (O&M) Decided on :03.07.2025 RAJNI . .Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, FEROZEPUR AND OTHERS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 3. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed in the year 2000 for challenging the impugned award dated 31.01.2000 (Annexure P-1) by which, the claim of the petitioner that her services were wrongly terminated by the respondent-department was rejected by the labour Court. .
2. Perusal of the file reveals that no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner since long.
3. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence, it can be safely presumed that after a period of more than two decades, the petitioner might not be interested in pursuing the present remedy.
4. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 03.07.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.07.04 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document