Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2000 DAILYLAW 1709 (PNJ)

SHANGARA SINGH v. SURESH CHAND

FAO/1198/2000 · 2026-07-08

Parmod Goyal

body2000

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 FAO-1198-2000 (O&M) Date of decision:08.07.2026 SHANGARA SINGH ...APPELLANT VERSUS SURESH CHAND AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None for appellant. Mr. Priyanka Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. D.K. Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, Haryana for respondents No.4 and 5. Mr. V.D. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.6. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present is a fully burnt case. None is appearing on behalf of appellant and accordingly notice was issued directly to the appellant, however, as per service report, appellant has expired. 2. Unfortunately, in present case, no record is available. Learned counsel for respondents have shown their inability to place on record award as same is not available with them. 2. In these circumstances, present appeal is consigned to record room with liberty to appellant to get it revived by showing just cause and by placing on record paperbook. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 08.07.2026 Sunil Chander Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL CHANDER 2026.07.09 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document