203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2439-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 05, 2026 Jagmal Singh … Appellant Versus Parduman Kumar (since deceased) through LRs and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for the LRs of respondent No.1. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) In compliance of the previous order, Court no ce was sent to the sole appellant – Jagmal Singh. The same has been received with the report that he has since expired. No applica on ll date has been moved on behalf of his LRs to bring them on record as such. Apart from above, a perusal of the file would reveal that suit for declara on and joint possession as filed by plain ffs – Pardman Kumar and others (respondent Nos.1 to 4 herein) was decreed by the trial Court on 12.02.1997 by holding them to be en tled ½ share in the suit property. The ma6er was carried to appeal only by two of the defendants, namely, Jagmal Singh and Jai Pal, but the same was dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 18.05.2000. Against these concurrent findings, only one of the defendants, namely, Jagmal Singh has approached this Court by way of filing present regular second appeal. 2. As noted above, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the LRs of the appellants nor any applica on has been moved to bring them on record a:er the death of appellant. SARITA RANI 2026.05.05 17:06 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
RSA-2439-2000 (O&M) - 2 - 2026:PHHC:069521 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, present appeal stands dismissed in default for want of prosecu on with liberty to the LRs of the appellant to get it revived, in case any cause of ac on s ll survives. May 05, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.05.05 17:06 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order