Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2000 DAILYLAW 1656 (PNJ)

SHUBHAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/20003/2026 · 2026-05-06

Manisha Batra

body2000

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-2000 IN THE (211) SHUBHAM A STATE OF P CORAM:  Present: MANISHA B 1. Nagarik Surak anticipatory bai 126(2), 118(1) (for short “BN under Section Police Station 20003-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da AM AND ANOTHER Versus OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate f Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Pu ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition under S Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘B ry bail in DDR No.31 dated 21.02.202 118(1), 191(3), 190 and 118(2) of Bha rt “BNS”) arising out of FIR No.56 d ections 109, 118(1), 118(2), 126(2), tation City Kapurthala, District Kapurt JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-20003-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondent E MANISHA BATRA ocate for the petitioners G, Punjab under Section 482 of the Bharatiya hort ‘BNSS’), the petitioners seeks .02.2026 registered under Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 o.56 dated 19.02.2026 registered 6(2), 191(3) and 190 of BNS at Kapurthala. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-2000 2. were released o 3. the investigatio interrogation. 4. investigation incarceration i case, it is obs bail is made 10.04.2026 gra subject to com 5. application, if  06.05.2026 Amit Sharma 20003-2026 (O&M) (2) Vide order dated 10.04.2026 passed ased on interim bail and were directed to Learned State counsel filed states th stigation on 12.04.2026 and they are In view of the fact that the petitio ation and given the nature of the ation is not required. As such, withou is observed that a case for release of made out. Accordingly, the petition granting interim bail to the pet to compliance of conditions laid down Since the main petition has b ion, if any, is rendered infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned:    passed by this Court, the petitioners cted to join investigation. es that the petitioners have joined are not required for custodial petitioners have already joined the the allegations, their pre-trial without commenting on merits of ase of petitioners on anticipatory etition is allowed and the order he petitioners is made absolute, down in Section 482(2) of BNSS. has been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.