Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2000 DAILYLAW 1646 (PNJ)

BALJIT SINGH v. KULWINDER SINGH EKTC.

RSA/1053/2000 · 2026-01-15

Virinder Aggarwal

body2000

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 RSA No. 1053 of 2000 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- 15.01.2026 Baljit Singh ...Appellant Versus Kulwinder Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Gurdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. C.L. Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. *** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1. None is present on behalf of the appellant. Notice was issued to the appellant which was received back duly served but even thereafter none has come present to pursue the appeal. It seems that appellant is not interested in pursuing the instant appeal. 2. In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today. 3. Since the main appeal stands decided, the miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 15.01.2026 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2026.01.16 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment