Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2000 DAILYLAW 1632 (PNJ)

SARWAN SINGH v. U.T,CHANDIGARH

RFA/90/2000 · 2026-02-04

Harkesh Manuja

body2000

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SARWAN SINGH UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate and Ms. Kulwinder Kaur, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate with Mr. Manpreet for respondent HARKESH MANUJA For detailed order, see order of even date passed in “ 2000” titled as “ Pending application(s), if any, shall also 04.02.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SARWAN SINGH Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate and Ms. Kulwinder Kaur, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate with Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advocate for respondent-U.T. Chandigarh. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For detailed order, see order of even date passed in “ titled as “Phul Singh Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh Pending application(s), if any, shall also (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-90-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 04, 2026 .....Appellant ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Kulwinder Kaur, Advocate for the appellant(s). U.T. Chandigarh. For detailed order, see order of even date passed in “RFA-86- Phul Singh Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh”. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) February 04, 2026 - TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.02.19 17:38 I agree to specified portions of this document