Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-1891-2000 (O&M) and RSA-4049-2004 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Gurcharan Kaur
The Central Government through its Secretary Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi & others
Gurcharan Kaur
The Central Government through its Secretary Rehabilitation/Custodian Department, Govt. o
CORAM:
Present:
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
served or otherwise.
possible efforts including repeated letters sent to the sole appellant Gurcharan Kaur, there is no response. 2000 (O&M) and (O&M)
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1891- Gurcharan Kaur
Versus The Central Government through its Secretary Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi & others
RSA-4049- Gurcharan Kaur
Versus The Central Government through its Secretary Rehabilitation/Custodian Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi & others
Date of Decision: 12.02.2026 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punjab, for DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Notice issued to respondent No.1 have not been received back served or otherwise.
Learned counsel for the appellant possible efforts including repeated letters sent to the sole appellant Gurcharan Kaur, there is no response.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2000 (O&M)
…Appellant The Central Government through its Secretary Rehabilitation/Custodian Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi & others
...Respondents -2004 (O&M)
…Appellant The Central Government through its Secretary Rehabilitation/Custodian f India, New Delhi & others
...Respondents Date of Decision: 12.02.2026 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.2 & 3. Notice issued to respondent No.1 have not been received back
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite all possible efforts including repeated letters sent to the sole appellant Notice issued to respondent No.1 have not been received back submits that despite all possible efforts including repeated letters sent to the sole appellant – VIMAL KUMAR 2026.02.13 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA-1891-2000 (O&M) and RSA-4049-2004 (O&M)
longer interested concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below.
in default for non prosecution with liberty to the appellant to get the same revived in case any cause of acti
12.02.2026 Vimal
2000 (O&M) and (O&M)
( 2 )
It appears from the above circumstance that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the instant appeals, w concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below.
In view of the aforesaid position for non prosecution with liberty to the appellant to get the same revived in case any cause of action survives.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file.
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Whether reportable:
It appears from the above circumstance that the appellant is no in pursuing the instant appeals, which were filed against the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below. position, both the appeals are dismissed for non prosecution with liberty to the appellant to get the same on survives.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file.
(DEEPAK GUPTA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No It appears from the above circumstance that the appellant is no hich were filed against the , both the appeals are dismissed for non prosecution with liberty to the appellant to get the same
VIMAL KUMAR 2026.02.13 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document