217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-913-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 20, 2026 Kamal Industry … Appellant Versus Sham Lal and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.1. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) There is no representaon on behalf of the appellant despite the fact that on the previous date of hearing, last opportunity had been granted, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided. Not only this, inmaon was sent to Mr. S.C. Chhabra, Advocate, who was represenng the appellant through his e-mail. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. January 20, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.01.20 17:47 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order