205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10629-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.03.2026 Kuldeep Singh ... Petitioner Versus Commissioner, Rohtak Division Rohtak & Ors ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 3. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. Vide order dated 08.08.2024, fresh notices were issued to the petitioner as well as respondent No.4. As per office report, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back unserved with the report that petitioner – Kuldeep Singh son of Ramphal – has stated that the notice does not relate to him and the writ petition was not filed by him. There is no other address of the petitioner available except for the one as mentioned in the memo of parties. Today, again, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution. JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.17 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-10629-2000 -2- 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 16.03.2026 jk ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.17 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh