214
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** RSA-3361-2000 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.03.2026 Dalbir Singh and others . . . . Appellants Vs. Gurudwara Gurusar Brar and another ……Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - None for the appellants. None for respondent No.1. Mr. M.S. Virk, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Notices issued to appellant Nos.1 and 6 have been received back with the report that they have refused to accept the notice. Appellants No.2, 4 and 5 have been served. Appellant No.3 has no legal heir. On the other hand, respondent No.1 is also served through Manager, but nobody has put in appearance on behalf of appellants No.2, 4 and 5 and respondent No.1. 2. Since appellants No.1 and 6 refused to accept the notice and despite service upon appellants No.2, 4 and 5, nobody has put in appearance on their behalf, therefore, it appears that appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 09.03.2026 JUDGE 
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.03.09 18:14 I agree to specified portions of this document Chandigarh