108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RAVI KANT AND CHANDER BHAN (SINCE DECEASED) TH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Chetan Slathia, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA The 19.01.2000 passed by the value of the acquired land was assessed at Rs.235/ along with other statutory benefits. Learned cou 27.02.2024 received in his office wherein the appellants have desired not to pursue the present appeal. In view of the aforesaid, he does not wish to press the present appeal. The present appeal is thu Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 10.02.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAVI KANT AND ANR. Versus CHANDER BHAN (SINCE DECEASED) TH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Parit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Chetan Slathia, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been filed against the award dated 19.01.2000 passed by the learned Reference Court whereby, the market value of the acquired land was assessed at Rs.235/ with other statutory benefits. Learned counsel for the appellant refers to an e 27.02.2024 received in his office wherein the appellants have desired not to pursue the present appeal. In view of the aforesaid, he does not wish to press the present appeal. The present appeal is thus, disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA- 239-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 10, 2026 ........Appellants CHANDER BHAN (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS. AND ORS. ......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Parit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Chetan Slathia, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. present appeal has been filed against the award dated Reference Court whereby, the market value of the acquired land was assessed at Rs.235/- per square yard nsel for the appellant refers to an e-mail dated 27.02.2024 received in his office wherein the appellants have desired not In view of the aforesaid, he does not wish to press the s, disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) February 10, 2026 present appeal has been filed against the award dated Reference Court whereby, the market per square yard mail dated 27.02.2024 received in his office wherein the appellants have desired not In view of the aforesaid, he does not wish to press the TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.02.11 13:55 I agree to specified portions of this document