Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 203/2
PREM DATT SHARMA AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM:
Present:
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
respondents to revise the petitioners’ pay as per memo dated 19.12.2000, Annexure P- Government Government instead of 01
2. Department vide memo dated 21.04.2026, revised pay scale claimed by the petitioners fr been given to them in terms of memo dated 25.03.2015, whereby grant of the benefit was generalised for the employees with effect from 01.01.1996. He further submits that could only verify that petitioners no.1 to 6, 8 to 11 and 18 to 21 have been given the benefit IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-
Date of decision: May 01, 2026 TT SHARMA AND OTHERS Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA None for the petitioners. Mr. Suneel Ranga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia respondents to revise the petitioners’ pay as per memo dated 19.12.2000, -3, pertaining to revision of pay scales of Head Masters of Government High Schools and grant of selection grade to Lecturers of Government Senior Secondary Schools, instead of 01.08.2000. Learned State counsel, as per instructions received from the Department vide memo dated 21.04.2026, Annexure ‘A’, submits that the revised pay scale claimed by the petitioners fr been given to them in terms of memo dated 25.03.2015, whereby grant of benefit was generalised for the employees with effect from 01.01.1996. He further submits that the office records being very old, the Department could only verify that petitioners no.1 to 6, 8 to 11 and 18 to 21 have been given the benefit. The record of the remaining petitioners, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -12921-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: May 01, 2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Suneel Ranga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to revise the petitioners’ pay as per memo dated 19.12.2000, revision of pay scales of Head Masters of selection grade to Lecturers of with effect from 01.01.1996, Learned State counsel, as per instructions received from the Annexure ‘A’, submits that the revised pay scale claimed by the petitioners from 01.01.1996 has already been given to them in terms of memo dated 25.03.2015, whereby grant of benefit was generalised for the employees with effect from 01.01.1996.
being very old, the Department could only verify that petitioners no.1 to 6, 8 to 11 and 18 to 21 have been he record of the remaining petitioners, i.e., petitioners
s ...Respondents
seeking a direction to the respondents to revise the petitioners’ pay as per memo dated 19.12.2000, revision of pay scales of Head Masters of selection grade to Lecturers of , Learned State counsel, as per instructions received from the Annexure ‘A’, submits that the om 01.01.1996 has already been given to them in terms of memo dated 25.03.2015, whereby grant of benefit was generalised for the employees with effect from 01.01.1996. being very old, the Department could only verify that petitioners no.1 to 6, 8 to 11 and 18 to 21 have been s JASPREET KAUR 2026.05.05 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-12921-2002 (O&M) -2-
no.7 and 12 to 17 is not available, and specific instructions with respect to the release of the benefit to them could not be issued. However, in case they have any claim subsisting, they can approach the respondents by making appropriate representation, which will be considered in view of the memo dated 25.03.2015. 3. In view thereof, the petition stands disposed of in terms therewith. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. May 01, 2026
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) Jaspreet Kaur
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
JASPREET KAUR 2026.05.05 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh