IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (216) RSA-4071-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision:-23.04.2026 KEWAL NATH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS … Appellants Versus MANDIR SHRI SHIVALA BHOLO NATH ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, Ms. Gauri Sharma, Advocate for appellants No.2 to 5. None for the respondent. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. On the previous date, learned counsel for the appellants No.2 to 5 has submitted that they are not in touch with the appellants No.2 to 5. So, notice was issued to the appellants No.2 to 5. Appellants No.3 and 4 are served but none has appeared on their behalf. Appellants No.2 to 5 are reported to be dead but no legal heir of the appellants No.2 to 5 have come forward to get themselves impleaded. It seems that parties have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stand dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 23rd April, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.04.23 22:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document