(O&M) RAJINDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
RSA/1343/2000 · 2026-04-02
Sudeepti Sharma
body2000
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2000 DAILYLAW 1594 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2000 DAILYLAW 1594 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1343-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.04.2026 Rajinder Singh (Since Deceased) ......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA
J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the sole appellant has expired and he is unable to contact the legal representative(s) of the appellant. He, therefore, prays that the present appeal be dismissed as not pressed at this stage with liberty to the legal representative(s) of the appellant to seek revival of the same as and when he is able to establish contact with them.
2. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed at this stage with liberty to the legal representative(s) of the appellant to move an appropriate application for revival of the present appeal, if any cause of action survives.
3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE 02.04.2026 Virender
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.04.07 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document