J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LTD. v. MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WP/2001/2025 · 2026-08-19
body1999
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1999 DAILYLAW 940 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1999 DAILYLAW 940 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
903-WP.1999.2025+2.odt JVS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1999 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2001 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2004 OF 2025 J. Kumar Infraprojects Ltd. } Petitioner Versus Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development} Authority } Respondent Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Ms. Madhu Gadodia, Ms.Amruta Thakur and Mr. Aryan Garg i/b. Naik Naik & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Saket Mone i/b. Vidhi Partners, for the Respondent-MMRDA.
CORAM :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
DATE :
19th AUGUST, 2026 P.C.:
1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner draws our attention to the withdrawal praecipe dated 18th August, 2026 tendered to the Court. The same is marked as ‘X’, for identification.
2. It is pointed out that the concerned Respondent expect the Petitioner to withdraw the pending proceedings and enter into discussions for exploring the possibility of a settlement. In view of this aspect, the Petitioner desires to withdraw these Petitions and explore the possibility of a 1 JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2026.08.20 11:28:49 +0530
903-WP.1999.2025+2.odt settlement. It is submitted that in the event the settlement proceedings do not fructify, the Petitioner would be approaching the appropriate forum for the redressal of its grievances.
3. The Respondent has no-objection.
4. In view of the above, all these Petitions are disposed off as withdrawn, since the parties desire to explore the possibility of a settlement.
5. In the event the parties are unable to come to terms, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to avail of the remedy as is permissible in law.
[GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] 2