115 IN TH Schering AG M/s. Bangia CORAM: Present: HARKESH decision da District Jud rendition o appellants, [2] this Court v prayer mad declined. Th however, no [3] present app the present except to di [4] of prosecu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA Date ing AG of Germany and another Versus angia Schering and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR None for the parties. **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present appeal, ch on dated 09.10.1999 passed by the t Judge, Karnal, whereby a suit fo ion of accounts for profits, pre lants, was dismissed. The present appeal was admi ourt vide order dated 18.10.2000. r made by the appellants-plaintiffs ed. The appeal was taken up for regu er, no one appeared on behalf of the Today also, no one has com nt appeal. It appears that the partie resent appeal; as a result thereof, to dismiss the appeal for want of pro Consequently, the present app secution. UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 290 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 ...Appellants ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA al, challenge has been laid to a y the Court of learned Additional uit for permanent injunction for preferred at the instance of admitted for regular hearing by 000. Later, on 15.12.2000, the intiffs for interim stay was also r regular hearing on 08.10.2025; of the parties. s come present to pursue the parties have lost their interest in ereof, this Court has no option of prosecution. nt appeal is dismissed for want DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.08 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
         -2-     [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off.
April 07, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) ‘dk kamra’ JUDGE

    
    DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.08 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document