Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1999 DAILYLAW 83 (PNJ)

STATE OF PUNJAB v. AMAR SINGH AND ORS

RFA/305/1999 · 2026-01-13

Harkesh Manuja

body1999

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117 IN TH The State o Amar Singh CORAM: Present: HARKESH CM-4711- applicant-ap representati same is representati impleaded a MAIN APPE landowners the judgmen IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA Date tate of Punjab Versus Singh and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional for the appellant. Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate for the respondents-landowner **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) -CI-1999 Prayer in the present applica appellant/State of Punjab is for b entatives of respondent-Bikram Sing Notice of the application was is In view of the averments ma is allowed subject to all jus entatives of respondent-Bikram S ded as party respondents. APPEAL At the outset, learned coun wners submits that the present appe dgment dated 14.11.2025 passed by UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 305 of 1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2026 ...Appellant ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA ional Advocate General, Punjab cate owners. application moved on behalf of s for bringing on record the legal Singh, who died on 20.08.1997 was issued on 25.08.1999. ts made in the application, the ll just exceptions. The legal am Singh are ordered to be counsel for the respondents- t appeal is squarely covered by ed by this Court in RFA No. 304 DINESH KUMAR 2026.01.13 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document          -2-     of 1999, titled “State of Punjab Versus Mangat Ram and others”, whereby the appeal filed by the appellant-State of Punjab was dismissed. [2] Learned counsel for the appellant is not in a position to controvert the above factual position. [3] After going through the judgment referred to above as well as the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for the respondents. [4] Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed in the same terms as Mangat Ram’s case (supra). [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off.  January 13, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) ‘dk kamra’ JUDGE            DINESH KUMAR 2026.01.13 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document