IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 (I) CWP-4064-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision : July 13, 2026 DR. BRIJ BHUSHAN GOYAL -PETITIONER V/S THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS (II) CWP-146-2002 (O&M) DR. KARAM SINGH -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Bikramjit Singh Patwalia, Advocate for the petitioner (in CWP-4064-1999) and for the respondent No.4 (in CWP-146-2002). Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Ishaan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondents No.4 and 5. KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, having regard to the nature of the relief claimed in the writ petition and the efflux of time, the cause of action does not appear to survive at this stage. Accordingly, he does not press the writ petition. He, however, prays for liberty to seek revival thereof in the event the grievance of the petitioner continues to subsist. 2. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed, with liberty (supra). 3. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on file of connected case. (KULDEEP TIWARI) July 13, 2026 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.07.15 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment