Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 202
CWP-7171-1999
Date of Decision:-07.07.2026 Ram Kanwar and others … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others
... Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- None for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. ***** VIKAS BAHL
, J.(Oral)
1. A perusal of file would show that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last two dates of hearing.
2. Today also, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to inform the Court as to whether the petitioners wish to pursue the present writ petition or not.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same in case they want to pursue the present writ petition or in case any cause survives.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 07.07.2026 Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2026.07.08 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh