CWP-16930-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 JITENDER SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Jitender Singh Kundu for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the respondents to with effect from the date advertisement 01/1999 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents representation, dated General, Secondary accordance with law within 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: JITENDER SINGH AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Jitender Singh Kundu, Advocate for the petitioners. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to consider the petitioner with effect from the date other candidates were appointed pursuant to advertisement 01/1999. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioners will be satisfied in case pending representation, dated 25.03.2026 specified period. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Additional accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State , dated 25.03.2026, will be decided by Secondary Education, by passing a speaking accordance with law within a period of six months IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16930-2026 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate inter alia, seeking a writ of consider the petitioners’ appointment other candidates were appointed pursuant to petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this atisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to 25.03.2026, Annexure P-8, in a Additional Advocate General, Haryana, /State and submits that the pending will be decided by respondent no.2/Director by passing a speaking/reasoned order in months. seeking a writ of appointment other candidates were appointed pursuant to submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this is directed to , in a , the pending Director order in AMAN DUA 2026.05.27 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-16930-202 5. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. O 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 26.05.2026 Ad 2026 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No s In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) AMAN DUA 2026.05.27 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document