Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1998 DAILYLAW 95 (PNJ)

STATE OF HARYANA v. CHAMAN LAL & ORS

RFA/4190/1998 · 2026-07-13

Jagmohan Bansal

body1998

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-4190 of 1998(O&M) & XObjection-14-CI-1999 RFA-4191 of 1998 (O&M) & Xobjection-15-CI-1999 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 RFA-4190 of 1998(O&M) & XObjection-14-CI-1999 Date of decision : July 13, 2026 State of Haryana ...... Appellant Versus Chaman Lal and others ...... Respondents RFA-4191 of 1998 (O&M) & XObjection-15-CI-1999 State of Haryana ...... Appellant Versus Vijay Kumar and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL *** Present :-Mr. Abhinash Jain, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the appellant. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel fairly concedes that the Reference Court in the present cases has assessed market value at the rate of Rs.2000/- per marla and this Court in connected matter vide order dated 13.11.2009 passed in RFA-2617 of 2001 has enhanced that amount from Rs.2000/- per marla to Rs.3200/- per marla. ARCHANA ARORA 2026.07.14 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RFA-4190 of 1998(O&M) & XObjection-14-CI-1999 RFA-4191 of 1998 (O&M) & Xobjection-15-CI-1999 2 2. In wake of aforestated position, the appeals of the State are not sustainable. The same are hereby dismissed. 3. The land owners with respect to their cross-objections are at liberty to move an appropriate application within one year from today, if cause survives. 4. Pending CM, if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE July 13, 2026 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No ARCHANA ARORA 2026.07.14 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document