MOHINDER SINGH v. BABU RAM @ BABU SINGH AND OTHERS
RSA/3303/1998 · 2026-05-13
Amarinder Singh Grewal
body1998
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1998 DAILYLAW 86 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1998 DAILYLAW 86 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-3303-1998(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (209) RSA-3303-1998(O&M) Date of Decision:-13.05.2026 Mohinder Singh ……Appellant Versus Babu Ram @ Babu Singh and Others ……Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: Mr. Lavish, Advocate,
for the appellant. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
1. As per report of Registry, notice issued to the sole appellant received back with the report of incomplete address.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite repeated efforts, he has not been able to establish contact with the appellant. Even today, learned counsel has expressed his inability to proceed further in the matter as he continues to have no instructions or communication from the appellant.
2. It, therefore, appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal.
3. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket for an indefinite period.
4. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. SHUBHAM 2026.05.15 11:57 I am the author of this document
RSA-3303-1998(O&M)
5. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to seek revival of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any worthwhile cause survives for consideration.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 13.05.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No SHUBHAM 2026.05.15 11:57 I am the author of this document