Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1998 DAILYLAW 80 (PNJ)

PEHLAD SINGH v. SUNIL DALAL ETC

RFA/802/1998 · 2026-03-13

Harkesh Manuja

body1998

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PEHLAD SINGH SUNIL DALAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Sachin Mittal, HARKESH MANUJA By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to an award dated 23.03.1998 passed by learned cum-Reference Cou under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions informs that parties have entered into settlement. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to controvert this fact. In view thereof, the same is thus disposed of settlement has not taken place between the parties, he shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present appeal. Pending application(s), if 13.03.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: PEHLAD SINGH Versus SUNIL DALAL AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Rajender Goel, Advocate for the Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to an award dated 23.03.1998 passed by learned Reference Court, Gurgaon arising out of reference petition preferred under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions informs that parties have entered into settlement. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to controvert this fact. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present appeal, the same is thus disposed of. However, if the appellant finds that the settlement has not taken place between the parties, he shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present appeal. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-802-1998 Date of Decision: March 13, 2026 ........Appellant ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the appellant. Advocate for the respondents. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to an award dated 23.03.1998 passed by learned Additional District Judge- arising out of reference petition preferred under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions informs Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to no cause survives in the present appeal, and . However, if the appellant finds that the settlement has not taken place between the parties, he shall be at liberty any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 1998 March 13, 2026 By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to an - arising out of reference petition preferred Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions informs Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to and . However, if the appellant finds that the settlement has not taken place between the parties, he shall be at liberty TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.03.19 09:35 I agree to specified portions of this document