Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

1998 DAILYLAW 769 (BOM)

MAUSIN SULEMAN SHIVANI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APEAL/892/1998 · 2026-08-28

Criminal Appealbody1998

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4-apeal-892-1998.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 892 OF 1998 Mausin S. Shivani …Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ………….. Ms Misbah Khan i/by. Mr. Amin Solkar for the Appellant. Mr. Yogesh Y. Dabake, APP for the Respondent/State. ………….. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 28.08.2026. P.C. : 1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 27.11.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.326 of 1995. 2. By the impugned judgment and order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 397 , 452 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer R.I. for seven years and five years respectively. 3. On 4.8.2026, this Court passed the following order: “1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the pendency of the present appeal, the appellant has expired. 2. Learned APP seeks time to verify the said fact. At his request, list on 28th August 2026. Dinesh S. Sherla 1/2 DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date: 2026.08.28 17:44:33 +0530 4-apeal-892-1998.odt 4. Learned APP submits that attempt was made to verify the statement, however, no other family member of the appellant is residing on the address mentioned in the memo of appeal. Accepting the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, the Appeal is dismissed as abated. [N.R.BORKAR, J.] Dinesh S. Sherla 2/2