Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1480-1998 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.01.2026 SMT. SHERO ....Petitioner Versus JAGDISH AND ANOTHER
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA ***** Present: Mr. Nischal Manchanda, Advocate and Mr. Vipul Thakur, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Mahabir Singh Tanwar, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Tewatia, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. ***** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not in touch with the appellant.
2. Dismissed in default for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to get it revived, in case, any cause of action survives.
3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.
(DEEPAK GUPTA)
JUDGE 21.01.2026 mohit goyal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT GOYAL 2026.01.22 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document