RFA-4047 118 (2 cases) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 1. Kamla Devi @ Kamla Sharma State of Haryana and another 2. Kamla Devi @ Kamla Sharma State of Haryana and ors. CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Appeals are being decided as acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. For the sake of brevity, facts a 2. laid to the District Judge, Court’), whereby a the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short the Act, came to be disposed of. 4047-1998 (O&M) [1] 118 (2 cases) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 RFA Kamla Devi @ Kamla Sharma Versus State of Haryana and another RFA Kamla Devi @ Kamla Sharma Versus State of Haryana and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Vide this common order, the abovesaid two Appeals are being decided as both have acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. For the sake of brevity, facts are being taken from By way of filing the present appeal challenge has been laid to the Award dated 12.05.1998, passed by the learned District Judge, Ambala, (hereinafter referr Court’), whereby a petition under Section 18 read with Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short the Act, came to be disposed of. ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 RFA-4047-1998 (O&M) …….Appellant Versus ..….Respondents RFA-4049-1998 (O&M) …….Appellant Versus ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Advocate Haryana. the abovesaid two Regular First both have arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. For re being taken from RFA No.4047-1998. way of filing the present appeal challenge has been passed by the learned Additional , (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Reference petition under Section 18 read with Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short the Act, came to be Regular First arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. For . way of filing the present appeal challenge has been Additional ed to as the ‘Reference petition under Section 18 read with Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short the Act, came to be SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.12 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RFA-4047 3. the LRs of appellant(s) have been informed about the pendency of the present and thus, he is unable to contest the appeal(s). 4. In view of the above, the present appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the LRs of appellant(s), in case, decide liberty to seek revival of the present appeal appropriate application in this regard. 5. disposed of. 09.03.2026 sanjay 4047-1998 (O&M) [2] Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that despite the LRs of appellant(s) have been informed about the pendency of present appeal(s), yet they are not ready to and thus, he is unable to contest the appeal(s). In view of the above, the present appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the LRs of appellant(s), in case, decide to pursue the litigation liberty to seek revival of the present appeal appropriate application in this regard. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 09.03.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? ] Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that despite the LRs of appellant(s) have been informed about the pendency of they are not ready to pursue their cause and thus, he is unable to contest the appeal(s). In view of the above, the present appeal(s) are hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the LRs of appellant(s), to pursue the litigation in future, he/she shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present appeal(s) by moving an Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that despite the LRs of appellant(s) have been informed about the pendency of their cause hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the LRs of appellant(s), he/she shall be at by moving an Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.12 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document