IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (217/1) RSA-3967-1998(O&M) Date of Decision:-24.03.2026 Rajia and Others ……Appellants Versus Mandir and Baghica and Others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: Ms. Harjeet Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Sukhandeep Singh Brar, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Service of respondents No.5 to 15 is not necessary vide order dated 07.01.1999. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that despite repeated efforts, she has not been able to establish contact with appellants. Even today, learned counsel has expressed her inability to proceed further in the matter as she continues to have no instructions or communication from the appellants. 2. It, therefore, appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket for an indefinite period. -1- SHUBHAM 2026.03.25 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order 4. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. 5. However, liberty is granted to the appellants to seek revival of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any worthwhile cause survives for consideration. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 24.03.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2- SHUBHAM 2026.03.25 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order