IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 210 I. RSA-264-1998 (O&M) Balram Bhardwaj and Others …..Appellants Vs. Gurdas Ram and Others .….Respondents II. RSA-263-1998 (O&M) Balram Bhardwaj and Others …..Appellants Vs. Gurdas Ram and Others .….Respondents Date of Decision: 20.01.2026 CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the appellants. Ms. Jyo Sareen, Advocate for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 ex parte vide order dated 18.02.1998. Service qua respondent No.3 is dispensed with vide order dated 18.07.2024. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for both the pares submits that they are not in touch with their respecve clients. Perusal of the record would reveal that simplicitor suit for seeking declaraon was filed by plainff Gurdas Ram (respondent No.1 herein), that he was Managing Director of Kamyab Chit Fund and Finance Pvt. Ltd. As stated by learned counsel, at the me of filing the appeal, appellant was 78 years of age, which means by now he must be 100+ years, in case, he is alive. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.01.20 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-264-1998 (O&M) RSA-263-1998 (O&M) -2- The present appeal is hereby disposed of with liberty to the pares to get it revived, in case, any cause of acon sll survives. Pending applicaon(s), if any, also stands disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE January 20, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.01.20 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document