[220] Prem Chan Haryana W Mukarpur, Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] 14.09.1998 Compensat [2] passed qua penalty of paid. [3] appeal is di [4] disposed of 16.02.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA FAO-1538 Date of De Chand versu ana Wood Products, Village arpur, Jagadhri and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA None for the appellant. Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate and for respondent No.1. Mr. Suvir Dewan, Advocate **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The present appeal is dire .1998 passed by the Commiss pensation Act, 1923. From the perusal of records, it qua penalty as contemplated unde lty of 35% of the compensation along With the aforesaid modificat disposed off. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 1538-1999 (O&M) of Decision : 16.02.2026 …Appellant versus ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN and Ms. Alisha Arora, Advocate for respondent No.2. s directed against the Order date mmissioner under the Workmen rds, it is evident that no order has bee under Section 4A of 1923 Act. Th along with the statutory interest to b dification in the impugned order, th neous application(s), if any, stand (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No r dated rkmen’s as been ct. The st to be der, the stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.16 17:44 I agree to specified portions of this document