Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3378-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 28, 2026 Raghubir and others … Appellants Versus Narata alias Narota and others …Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for appellant No.3. Mr. Eklavya Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
DEEPAK GUPTA
, J.(Oral)
There is no representaon on behalf of the appellants. As noced in the previous order, out of 05 appellants, appellant Nos.1, 2, 4 & 5 were reported to have expired. No applicaon to bring their respecve LRs has been moved ll date. Only appellant No.3 was appearing through his counsel. Today, there is no representaon on his behalf also. It appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. January 28, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SARITA RANI 2026.01.28 17:14 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order