Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1998 DAILYLAW 108 (PNJ)

PARMINDER SINGH v. SMT. SUKHWANT KAUR ETC.

RSA/15/1998 · 2026-08-13

Parmod Goyal

body1998

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105 RSA-15-1998 Decided on. 13.08.2026 PARMINDER SINGH & ORS ....APPELLANTS VERSUS SMT. SUKHWANT KAUR & ORS. …RESPONDENTS CR-2064-2011 PARMINDER SINGH & ORS ....PETITIONER VERSUS SMT. SUKHWANT KAUR & ORS. ….RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate with Ms. Vamika Johar, Advocate Ms. Rajdeep Kaur, Advocate for the appellants-defendants in RSA-15-1998 and for the petitioner in CR-2064-2011. Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the respondents-plaintiffs. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) During the course of arguments, learned counsel for appellants- defendants on instructions from the appellants-defendants has offered to settle the matter by offering ownership and possession to the extent of 4 kanals land in killa No.19 in lieu of ownership and possession of share of respondents-plaintiffs in the joint house situated in abadi deh/dera which is subject matter of present litigation. 2. Learned counsel for appellants-defendants has submitted that during the execution proceedings also similar offer was made to POONAM 2026.08.14 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-15-1998 and CR-2064-2011 -2- respondents-plaintiffs wherein 2 kanals of land was offered out of killa No.19 in lieu of share of respondents-plaintiffs in abadi deh/dera house. He asserts that now, under the instructions of appellants-defendants this offer is being made for 4 kanals instead of 2 kanals. 3. Learned counsel on instructions of respondents-plaintiffs, out of which respondent No.1-plaintiff (duly identified by the learned counsel for respondents-plaintiffs) is present today in the Court has accepted the offer given by learned counsel for appellants-defendants. 4. It is not in doubt that possession of entire killa No.19 is with respondents-plaintiffs, therefore respondents-plaintiffs shall vacate 4 kanals out of killa No.19 and also hand over possession of the house to appellants- defendants and 4 kanals out of killa No.19. 5. It is also agreed that the appellants-defendants shall relinquish their rights in 4 kanals land which is kept by respondents-plaintiffs in terms of present agreement and similarly the rights vested in respondents-plaintiffs to the extent of 1/32 share of land measuring 3 kanals 2 marlas which is stated to be situated in abadi deh/dera upon which house is constructed shall vest exclusively in appellants-defendants by virtue of present order. 6. The appeal as well as revision are accordingly disposed of in view of above terms mentioned. 7. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of accordingly. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 13.08.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No POONAM 2026.08.14 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document