Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1998 DAILYLAW 101 (PNJ)

HARI RAM ETC. v. THE DISTT. COLLECTOR, FARIDABA

CWP/4228/1998 · 2026-07-21

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body1998

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4228-1998 (O & M) Date of decision: 21.07.2026 HARI RAM DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS V/S THE COLLECTOR, FARIDABAD AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. (through video conferencing) Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order of Assistant Collector Ist Grade dated 12.02.1996 and Collector dated 23.10.1997 or for issuance of any other direction. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that respondent No.3-Gram Panchayat who is the contesting party is not appearing in the matter. It is submitted that in the said circumstances, the present petition be disposed of and liberty be granted to the petitioners to revive the same, in case, the Gram Panchayat in pursuance of impugned orders files execution petition or any cause arises. MANISHA 2026.07.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4228-1998 (O & M) -2- 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 21, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document