Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1997 DAILYLAW 36 (PNJ)

JOGINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/19970/2026 · 2026-05-06

Manisha Batra

body1997

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-1997 IN THE (210 ) JOGINDER STATE OF CORAM:  Present: MANISHA B 1. Bharatiya Na petitioner seek registered und short “BNS”) Navi Baradari, 2. petitioner wa investigation. 19970-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da DER KAUR Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Jitender Singh Dadwal, Advo Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Pu ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition u a Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 r seeks anticipatory bail in case FI d under Section 318(4) of Bharatiya NS”) and Section 82 of Registration radari, District Jalandhar. Vide order dated 10.04.2026 p r was released on interim bail a ation. JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-19970-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent E MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner G, Punjab tion under Section 482 of the 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the FIR No.47 dated 06.03.2026 aratiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for ration Act, 1977 at Police Station 026 passed by this Court, the bail and was directed to join AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-1997 3. petitioner has for custodial i the role of the 4. investigation a petitioner, the circumstances pre-trial incar sentencing. observed that out. Accordin granting inter compliance of 5. application, if  06.05.2026 Amit Sharma 9970-2026 (O&M) (2) Learned State counsel on in has joined the investigation on 13 odial interrogation to unearth a larger of the petitioner and involvement of an In view of the fact that the petit ation and given the nature of allegati r, the part attributed to her and tances, his pre-trial incarceration is no incarceration should not be a r ng. As such, without commenting d that a case for release of petitioner o cordingly, the petition is allowed interim bail to the petitioner is nce of conditions laid down in Section Since the main petition has b ion, if any, is rendered infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned:    on instructions states that the 13.04.2026 and she is required larger conspiracy and to ascertain t of any other person. e petitioner has already joined the llegations as levelled against the and the attendant facts and n is not required. Even otherwise e a replica of post-conviction enting on merits of case, it is ioner on anticipatory bail is made wed and the order 10.04.2026 er is made absolute, subject to ection 482(2) of BNSS. has been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.