APHC010354691997 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 1484/1997 Between: 1. B.JAYALAKSHMI,, W/O SUDHA SANKARA RAO, D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. 2. B.NAGAMANI,, W/O VISWESWARA RAO, D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. B.JHANSI,, W/O POORNACHANDRASEKHARA RAO, D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. 4. B.UMAMAHESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE VENKATA NARAYANA, BUSINESS D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. 5. B.PEETHAMBARESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE VENKATA NARAYANA, BUSINESS D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. 6. B.SUDHA SEKHARA RAO,, S/O LATE VENKATA NARAYANA, BUSINESS D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. 7. B.VISWESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE VENKATA NARAYANA, D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. 8. B. POORNACHANDRASEKHARA RAO,, S/O LATE VENKATA NARAYANA, D.NO.27/176, PATHARAMANNAPETA, MACHILIPATNAM. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. K SUBBA RAO, S/O LATE NAGABHUSHANAM, BUSINESS MANAGING & WORKING PARTNER OF SRI VENKATA SUBRAHMANESWARA ENGINEERING WORKS, JAGANNADHAPURAM, 2. T PANDU RANGA RAO, S/O LATE PATTABHIRAMAIAH, R/O JAGANNADHAPURAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): appeal against the jusgment & decree dt.3.11.97 passed by the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Machilipatnam in OS NO.58/86 IA NO: 1 OF 1997(CMP 21212 OF 1997 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of execution of the decree & judgment dt.3-11-97 passed in OS No.58/86 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Machilipatnam, pending disposal of the AS IA NO: 1 OF 1998(CMP 735 OF 1998 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in CMP No.21212/97 in AS No.1484/97 dt.24.12.97 IA NO: 1 OF 2002(CMP 798 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the condition directing the petitioners to deposit Rs.1500/- per month to the credit of this Suit OS No.58/86 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam which was imposed on them in CMP No.7351/98 IA NO: 2 OF 2002(CMP 13528 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP 21264 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2005(ASMP 21265 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 3 OF 2005(ASMP 21268 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2005(ASMP 21270 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2006(ASMP 94 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay of 1862 days in filing the above L.R. Application in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2006(ASMP 95 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To Condone the delay of 530 days in filing the above L.R. application and to pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 846 days in filing the application to bring the Legal Representative of the deceased 1st appellant in the above appeal in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the abatement of Appeal pursuant to the death of the 1st Appellant namely Balagam Jayalakshmi in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioner to come on record as the proposed legal representative of the deceased 1st appellant Balagam Jayalakshmi and implead him as appellant No.15 in the above appeal and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to bring the proposed legal representative of the deceased 7th respondent viz Singothu Sudha and implead the as Respondent NO.8. and 9 in the above appeal in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. S RAMACHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.1484 of 1997 JUDGMENT: When the matter was listed on 07.04.2026, none appeared for the appellant. 2. Sri O. Manoher Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent is present. 3. Though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today, none appeared for the appellant. 3. It appears that the appellant has no interest in prosecuting the Appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 08.04.2026 JLSR 7 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.1484 of 1997 Date: 08.04.2026 JLSR