Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1996 DAILYLAW 74 (PNJ)

MEENA DEVI ETC. v. GIAN CHAND ETC.

RSA/1328/1996 · 2026-09-03

Amarinder Singh Grewal

body1996

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1328 of 1996 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 03.09.2026 MEENA DEVI AND OTHERS ......APPELLANTS Vs. GIAN CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS .........RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Gourave Bhayyia Gilhotra and Mr. Vishawjeet Singh, Advocates, for the respondents. ***** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Even on the second call, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. However, liberty is granted to the appellants to move an appropriate application for revival of the appeal, if so advised, in accordance with law. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. SEPTEMBER 03, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No NITIN 2026.09.03 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document