COCP-3334 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 Kushal Pal Lamba and others Sh. Santosh Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. violation of order dated Division Bench of this Court in Lamba and 2. for respondent No. 1 stay has been granted in civil revision petition(s) filed against the orders passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Palwal, vide which the application under Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, had been declined. He submits that, in the said revision petition stay of disbursement of the amount has been granted subject to deposit of the decretal amount. Learned counsel further 3334-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Kushal Pal Lamba and others Versus Sh. Santosh Kumar Yadav and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vikas Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandi Garg, Advocate for Mr. KS Kang, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been filed violation of order dated 07.10.2016 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in CWP-21266 Lamba and others vs. National Highway Authority of India At the very outset, on instructions for respondent No. 1-National Highway Authority of India, submits that stay has been granted in civil revision petition(s) filed against the orders by the Court of Additional District Judge, Palwal, vide which the ion under Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, had been declined. He submits that, in the said revision petition stay of disbursement of the amount has been granted subject to deposit of the decretal amount. Learned counsel further IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3334-2025 Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vikas Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. . Nandi Garg, Advocate for Mr. KS Kang, Advocate for respondent No. 1-NHAI. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a 21266-2016, titled as ‘ Kushal Pal National Highway Authority of India and others’. on instructions learned counsel appearing National Highway Authority of India, submits that stay has been granted in civil revision petition(s) filed against the orders by the Court of Additional District Judge, Palwal, vide which the ion under Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, had been declined. He submits that, in the said revision petition stay of disbursement of the amount has been granted subject to deposit of the decretal amount. Learned counsel further submits that the said decretal alleging a Kushal Pal learned counsel appearing National Highway Authority of India, submits that stay has been granted in civil revision petition(s) filed against the orders by the Court of Additional District Judge, Palwal, vide which the ion under Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, had been declined. He submits that, in the said revision petition stay of disbursement of the amount has been granted subject to deposit of the submits that the said decretal RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3334 amount stands deposited vide demand draft dated16.12.2025. He also contends that, in view thereof, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. controvert the No. 1-NHAI. 4. 5. required to be passed in the present petition of, as having been rendered infructuus. 6. 7. 30.04.2026 rishu 3334-2025 -2- amount stands deposited vide demand draft dated16.12.2025. He also contends that, in view thereof, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to controvert the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for respondent NHAI. Heard. In view of the facts noted required to be passed in the present petition as having been rendered infructuus. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable amount stands deposited vide demand draft dated16.12.2025. He also contends that, in view thereof, the instant petition has been rendered Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for respondent above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition; and the same stands disposed Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No amount stands deposited vide demand draft dated16.12.2025. He also contends that, in view thereof, the instant petition has been rendered Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for respondent above, no further orders are disposed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.