Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CWP-1250 of 1996(O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1250 of 1996 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 SAGAR ….Petitioner
V/S THE COLLECTOR MOHINDERGARH AT NARNAUL AND OTHERS … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA, JUDGE
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
**** VIKAS BAHL, J. (Oral)
1.
None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing. Today, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to inform the Court as to whether the petitioner wishes to pursue the present writ petition or not.
2.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case he wants to pursue the present writ petition or in case any cause survives.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
1.
13.07.2026
Kamal Gandhi
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KAMAL GANDHI 2026.07.14 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document