DHARAM SINGH S/O BHAGIRATH v. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS
RFA/1479/1996 · 2026-07-09
Jagmohan Bansal
body1996
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 60 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 60 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104
RFA-1479-1996 Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 Dharam Singh
…Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Abhinav Kalia, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana ***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions from his client, thus, appeal may be disposed of, however, liberty may be granted to move an appropriate application within 6 months, if cause survives.
2.
In the backdrop, the appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid liberty.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 09.07.2026 Mohit Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.10 09:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.