Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1996 DAILYLAW 56 (PNJ)

SURIDNER SINGH v. STATE OF HY.ETC.

RSA/1141/1996 · 2026-07-01

Harkesh Manuja

body1996

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA No.1141 of 1996 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 203-2 CONSTABLE CONSTABLE CONSTABLE CONSTABLE SURINDER SINGH SURINDER SINGH SURINDER SINGH SURINDER SINGH Vs Vs Vs Vs HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE HON'BLE HON'BLE HON'BLE Present: Mr. for the Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgment decree dated 13.11.1995 appeal of the respondent was accepted and the judgment and decree dated 10.04.1995 passed by the learned Trial Court was set aside. At the very outset, learned counsel for the cause survives in the present appeal as the dues stands released to the appellant. In view of above withdrawn. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. Pending application(s), if any shall sta July July July July 01 01 01 01, 202 , 202 , 202 , 2026666 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 1996 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. RSA No. RSA No. RSA No.11 11 11 11 Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision SURINDER SINGH SURINDER SINGH SURINDER SINGH SURINDER SINGH HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HON'BLE HON'BLE HON'BLE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgment 13.11.1995 passed by the learned District Judge, Karnal, whereby appeal of the respondent was accepted and the judgment and decree dated passed by the learned Trial Court was set aside. At the very outset, learned counsel for the cause survives in the present appeal as the dues stands released to the appellant. In view of above statement, the present appeal is . Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. Pending application(s), if any shall sta Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH 11 11 11 1141 41 41 41 of of of of 1996 1996 1996 1996 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision: : : : 01 01 01 01.0.0.0.07777.202 .202 .202 .2026666 ...... ...... ...... ......Appellant Appellant Appellant Appellant HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL HARYANA STATE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, KARNAL ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJAAAA Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgment and passed by the learned District Judge, Karnal, whereby appeal of the respondent was accepted and the judgment and decree dated passed by the learned Trial Court was set aside. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that no cause survives in the present appeal as the dues stands released to the appellant. , the present appeal is dismissed as . Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 and passed by the learned District Judge, Karnal, whereby appeal of the respondent was accepted and the judgment and decree dated that no dismissed as MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.02 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment