HARMAN KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7667/2026 · 2026-07-01
Shalini Singh Nagpal
body1996
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 54 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 54 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-7667
107
HARMAN KAUR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J.
1.
filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the protect their life and liberty from respondents No.
2.
3.
accordance with petitioner No.1 is stated to be 13.11.1996 as per their petitioners was not approved by parents of No.4 to 6 were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners and in this regard petitioners moved representation to respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar taken.
4.
7667-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN AT CHANDIGARH
HARMAN KAUR AND ANOTHER VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Mr. Ankit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab
*** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J. (ORAL) Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the protect their life and liberty from respondents No. The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: The petitioners, who are ma accordance with Hindu rites and customs on petitioner No.1 is stated to be 20.08.2006 as per their Aadhaar Cards. It is stated that relationship of the petitioners was not approved by parents of were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners and in this regard petitioners moved representation to respondent No.2 erintendent of Police, Patiala and SHO P.S. Ganda Kheri Yamunanagar seeking protection of their life and liberty but no action was Notice of motion to official respondents. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-7667-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 01.07.2026 PETITIONERS
RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Punjab. t to their life and liberty, petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to protect their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 6. The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: The petitioners, who are major, solemnized marriage in on 23.06.2026. Date of birth of and that of petitioner No.2 is . It is stated that relationship of the petitioners was not approved by parents of petitioner No.1. Respondents were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners and in this regard petitioners moved representation to respondent No.2- Senior P.S. Ganda Kheri, District Patiala seeking protection of their life and liberty but no action was to official respondents. (O&M) .2026 S S
petitioners have to jor, solemnized marriage in Date of birth of and that of petitioner No.2 is . It is stated that relationship of the . Respondents were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners and in this Senior Patiala seeking protection of their life and liberty but no action was SUMIT SINGLA 2026.07.01 18:03 I agree to specified portions of this document
CRWP-7667
5. the official respondents and submits that petitioners’ representation was received and same shall be considered in accordance with law. 6. official respondents to decide repre 6) within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no ha the petitioners. 7. opinion with regard to the validity of petitioners’ marriage, factum of their age nor shall have any bearing on any civil or criminal action initiated or to be initiated against them. 8. 01.07.2026 Sumit Singla
7667-2026 (O&M) Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab the official respondents and submits that petitioners’ representation was received and same shall be considered in accordance with law. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to official respondents to decide representation dated within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no ha the petitioners.
It is, however, clarified that this order does not express any opinion with regard to the validity of petitioners’ marriage, factum of their age nor shall have any bearing on any civil or criminal action initiated or to be initiated against them.
Disposed of accordingly.
Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :
2 Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that petitioners’ representation was received and same shall be considered in accordance with law. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to sentation dated 25.06.2026 (Annexure P- within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to It is, however, clarified that this order does not express any opinion with regard to the validity of petitioners’ marriage, factum of their age nor shall have any bearing on any civil or criminal action initiated or to (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that petitioners’ representation was The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to - within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps warranted rm is caused to It is, however, clarified that this order does not express any opinion with regard to the validity of petitioners’ marriage, factum of their age nor shall have any bearing on any civil or criminal action initiated or to
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) SUMIT SINGLA 2026.07.01 18:03 I agree to specified portions of this document