BANWARI (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS v. MAM RAJ S/O MANGTA
RSA/1366/1996 · 2026-04-17
Virinder Aggarwal
body1996
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 5 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1996 DAILYLAW 5 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(201)
RSA-1366-1996 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-17.04.2026
BANWARI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS
… Appellants
Versus
MAN RAJ (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANOTHER
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate
for the appellants.
None for the respondents.
**** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral)
1.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants has stated that appeal has been rendered infructuous and he wishes to withdraw the same.
2.
Ordered accordingly.
3.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 17th April, 2026
JUDGE Poonam
Whether reasoned / speaking?
Yes / No
Whether reportable?
Yes / No
POONAM 2026.04.18 00:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document